Wednesday, February 22, 2006

Much ado about nothing. Except maybe now most of Congress is exposed for being political hacks--again.

This business about "6 major US ports being taken over by the Dubai, UAE" is, as the Wall Street Journal puts it, "alarmist nonsense."
The timing of this sudden uproar is also a tad suspicious. A bidding war for the British-owned P&O has been going on since last autumn, and the P&O board accepted Dubai's latest offer last month. The story only blew up last week, as a Florida firm that is a partner with P&O in Miami, Continental Stevedoring and Terminals Inc., filed a suit to block the purchase. Miami's mayor also sent a letter of protest to Mr. Bush. It wouldn't be the first time if certain politicians were acting here on behalf of private American commercial interests.

Critics also forget, or conveniently ignore, that the UAE government has been among the most helpful Arab countries in the war on terror. It was one of the first countries to join the U.S. container security initiative, which seeks to inspect cargo in foreign ports. The UAE has assisted in training security forces in Iraq, and at home it has worked hard to stem terrorist financing and WMD proliferation. UAE leaders are as much an al Qaeda target as Tony Blair.

. . .[snip]

As for the Democrats, we suppose this is a two-fer: They have a rare opportunity to get to the right of the GOP on national security, and they can play to their union, anti-foreign investment base as well. At a news conference in front of New York harbor, Senator Chuck Schumer said allowing the Arab company to manage ports "is a homeland security accident waiting to happen." Hillary Clinton is also along for this political ride.

So the same Democrats who lecture that the war on terror is really a battle for "hearts and minds" now apparently favor bald discrimination against even friendly Arabs investing in the U.S.? Guantanamo must be closed because it's terrible PR, wiretapping al Qaeda in the U.S. is illegal, and the U.S. needs to withdraw from Iraq, but these Democratic superhawks simply will not allow Arabs to be put in charge of American longshoremen. That's all sure to play well on al Jazeera.
Politically tone-deaf on the part of the administration? Possibly. But the overwrought concerns about terrorists from UAE being able to bring in hoards of terrorists on container ships with nuclear bombs? Moronic, unless you believe the hype. The fact is that most of our ports are "foreign owned," meaning companies from other countries lease the waterfront space (apparently 90% of west coast ports are held in such a fashion--listen to that report).

So chill out.

Via Instapundit

UPDATE: a smart guy at NRO agrees.